develooper Front page | perl.perl6.language | Postings from April 2005

Re: -X's auto-(un)quoting?

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Thomas Sandlaß
Date:
April 25, 2005 10:13
Subject:
Re: -X's auto-(un)quoting?
Message ID:
426D2530.7020807@orthogon.com
Juerd wrote:
> However, the discussion is about changing these simple, clear, and
> useful rules to a more complex situation of choosing a default based on
> what the default will be used for, making the default for methods the
> invocant rather than $_. I hate those plans and would love to see the
> current spec, that is as you decribe above, implemented in the "final"
> version.

I think your basic error in perception is that $_ is a runtime variable
while the invocant(s) are more a design time assumption of what the
method is working on. Perl6 has invented the notion of topic as a global
lexically scoped variable that is orthogonal to the invocant and non-invocant
parameters of (multi) methods. We have two distinct names for these two
concepts: $_ and $?SELF. Additional multi method invocants need names
anyway.

E.g. in methods of GUI classes the invocant would be the selected widget
and the topic the event.


> (Or well, I believed this was the spec until I tried finding it. I can
> find the stuff about .method defaulting to $_ in S12, but $_ being an
> alias for the invocant is harder to find.)

My reading is that the two concepts have developed concurrently and
only recently some pitfalls were identified when they are combined.
-- 
TSa (Thomas Sandlaß)


Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About