develooper Front page | perl.perl6.language | Postings from February 2002

Re: Re: RFC: new logical operator

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
jadams01
Date:
February 21, 2002 06:47
Subject:
Re: Re: RFC: new logical operator
Message ID:
Springmail.105.1014302826.0.83886400@www.springmail.com
"Randal L. Schwartz" <merlyn@stonehenge.com> wrote:

Sam> No, "but" is syntactically equivalent to "and" in English.  It
Sam> just implies that the second condition is not generally what
Sam> you'd expect if the first was true.

Randal> Maybe in the interest of huffman encoding, we could make
Randal> it "even_though". :)

Or we could compromise on "despite".

But (sigh) when I first looked at this proposal, I thought, "Now what the heck is he trying to say that 'and' doesn't cover?"

Is it really syntactic sugar if it's confusing at first glance?

     John A

Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About