develooper Front page | perl.perl6.language | Postings from January 2002

RE: Perl6 -- what is in a name?

From:
Garrett Goebel
Date:
January 28, 2002 11:52
Subject:
RE: Perl6 -- what is in a name?
Message ID:
71BEC0D4E1DED3118F7A009027B12028010BE1CE@EXCH_MISSION
From: Brent Dax [mailto:brentdax@cpan.org]
> Aaron Sherman:
> #
> # I think the first guy that gets hired to maintain Perl6 code,
> # and think "hey, I know Perl, no sweat" will disagree with
> # you.
> 
> I disagree.  He'll see stuff he doesn't understand and try to
> consult perldoc on it, at which point he'll realize that he's
> working with Perl 6.  Then he'll run out, get Camel IV, read
> it, and go back to work. Programmer is working with a better
> version of language, program is fixed, and ORA made fifty
> bucks.  Everybody's happy.  :^)

Perhaps. Or perhaps he'll be like our company's lead C++ developers. They
liked Perl4 well enough for a certain problem domain, saw some Perl5 code...
and have tried to stay away from it ever since.

Perl6 isn't going to make everyone happy.




nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About