develooper Front page | perl.perl6.language | Postings from May 2001

Re: what I meant about hungarian notation

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Simon Cozens
Date:
May 14, 2001 15:15
Subject:
Re: what I meant about hungarian notation
Message ID:
20010514231446.A4651@netthink.co.uk
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 05:16:34PM -0400, John Porter wrote:
> Simon Cozens wrote:
> > I'm not telling you how it *looks* in Perl 5, I'm telling you (in Perl 5
> > terms) what it will *mean*.
> 
> Fine, you're using perl5 as pseudocode.
> I could do that too.  But it has no bearing on the
> desirability of anyone's proposed perl6 syntax or
> semantics.

I know, I know, I know! Sheesh! I never said it *did*! I was just
explaining the current intended meaning of the syntax for those
who were stuff unaware! Stop looking for an argument!

-- 
Putting heated bricks close to the news.admin.net-abuse.* groups.
        -- Megahal (trained on asr), 1998-11-06
Thread Previous | Thread Next

nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About