develooper Front page | perl.perl6.language | Postings from May 2001

Re: what I meant about hungarian notation

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Me
Date:
May 14, 2001 12:04
Subject:
Re: what I meant about hungarian notation
Message ID:
097e01c0dca7$87934a40$6501a8c0@me
> Hm, OK. What does this access and using what method ?
> 
>   $foo = '1.2';
>   @bar[$foo];

This is an argument against conflating @ and %.

It has nothing to do with using [] instead of {}.

(I accept that the @/% issue is problematic. Otoh,
I don't yet see @/% conflation as being obviously
a bad move in the way you and Larry seem to.)

> Having different brackets for accessing array or hash
> actually does help when reading code. Using the same
> is just adding unnecessary complexity

I can't tell if you mean this as a summary of your
earlier points, in which case please note response
above, or a separate point. If it is a separate point,
you don't say why, so, why?


Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About