develooper Front page | perl.perl6.language | Postings from May 2001

RE: what I meant about hungarian notation

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
David Grove
Date:
May 10, 2001 08:26
Subject:
RE: what I meant about hungarian notation
Message ID:
BMEOIGKGMBHCLHHNLNABGENMCAAA.pete@petes-place.com
> Nope, I still think most ordinary people want different operators for
> strings than for numbers.  Dictionaries and calculators have very
> different interfaces in the real world, and it's false economy to
> overgeneralize.  Witness the travails of people trying to use
> cell phones to type messages.

Logic error: False analogy.

But as for the different operators, true, I believe, as long as we aren't
introducing strong typing, or traditional typing in the $%@& sense. This
addresses clarity without imposing verbosity. Add verbosity and there's no
reason not to migrate to C# or Java. But then, none of this has been
proposed so far except in the form of questions and concerns.

p



Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About