develooper Front page | perl.perl6.language | Postings from May 2001

Re: what I meant about hungarian notation

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Larry Wall
Date:
May 10, 2001 07:52
Subject:
Re: what I meant about hungarian notation
Message ID:
200105101447.HAA28642@kiev.wall.org
Me writes:
: Larry:
: > Currently, @ and [] are a promise that you don't intend to use string
: > indexing on this variable.  The optimizer can make good use of this
: > information.  For non-tied arrays of compact intrinsic types, this
: > is going to be a major performance win in Perl 6.
: 
: Assuming that optimization opportunities remained intact,

They won't, but go on.

: do you think conflating @ and % would be a perl6 design win?

Nope, I still think most ordinary people want different operators for
strings than for numbers.  Dictionaries and calculators have very
different interfaces in the real world, and it's false economy to
overgeneralize.  Witness the travails of people trying to use
cell phones to type messages.

Larry

Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About