Front page | perl.perl6.language |
Postings from May 2001
> > > I think Uri's qh() suggestion is the cleanest: > > Interesting train of thought, since one of the ideas was that qw() is > ugly and has to go. (Larry's been saying this for nearly two years now, > it's just that people sometimes don't listen. :) Let's keep it and add > something similarly ugly to keep it company! > i use Perl everyday, so from my practical standpoint, i find that qw() helps my code to look a lot cleaner and simpler to read monty