Re: End-of-scope actions: Toward a hybrid approach.

On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 07:40:26PM -0700, Tony Olekshy wrote:
> The problem may be that a dynamic always statement means both
> "no matter what happens" and "not until later".  The static
> finally clause just means "no matter what happened" (the effect
> is immediate).
I'm fond of post, myself.  Simply means "subsequent to", literaly (m-w.com,
post-, 2a.  Yes, I'm anal sometimes.)  "Always" makes me say "but when", and
"later" seems like the wrong part-of-speech to me.
	-=- James Mastros
-- 
"All I really want is somebody to curl up with and pretend the world is a
safe place."
AIM: theorbtwo 	     homepage: http://www.rtweb.net/theorb/

• End-of-scope actions, redux. by Tony Olekshy
• Re: End-of-scope actions: Unexpected behavior. by Tony Olekshy
• End-of-scope actions: Core exceptions. by Tony Olekshy
• End-of-scope actions: Toward a hybrid approach. by Tony Olekshy
• Re: End-of-scope actions: Toward a hybrid approach. by Simon Cozens
• Re: End-of-scope actions: Toward a hybrid approach. by John Porter
• Re: End-of-scope actions: Toward a hybrid approach. by Simon Cozens
• Re: End-of-scope actions: Toward a hybrid approach. by schwern
• Re: End-of-scope actions: Toward a hybrid approach. by Simon Cozens
• Re: End-of-scope actions: Toward a hybrid approach. by schwern
• Re: End-of-scope actions: Toward a hybrid approach. by Simon Cozens
• Re: End-of-scope actions: Toward a hybrid approach. by David L. Nicol
• Re: End-of-scope actions: Toward a hybrid approach. by Tony Olekshy
• Re: End-of-scope actions: Toward a hybrid approach. by James Mastros
• Re: End-of-scope actions: Toward a hybrid approach. by Glenn Linderman
• Re: End-of-scope actions: Toward a hybrid approach. by Tony Olekshy
• Re: End-of-scope actions: Toward a hybrid approach. by Glenn Linderman
• Re: End-of-scope actions: Toward a hybrid approach. by John Porter
• Re: End-of-scope actions: Toward a hybrid approach. by Glenn Linderman
• Re: End-of-scope actions: Garbage collection. by Dan Sugalski
• Re: End-of-scope actions: Garbage collection. by Dan Sugalski
• Re: End-of-scope actions: Garbage collection. by Tony Olekshy
• Re: End-of-scope actions: Garbage collection. by Tony Olekshy
• End-of-scope actions: Garbage collection. by Tony Olekshy
• End-of-scope actions: do/eval duality. by Tony Olekshy
• Re: End-of-scope actions: do/eval duality. by Glenn Linderman
• Re: End-of-scope actions: do/eval duality. by Bart Lateur
• Re: End-of-scope actions: do/eval duality. by Glenn Linderman
• Re: End-of-scope actions: do/eval duality. by Branden
• Re: End-of-scope actions: do/eval duality. by Bart Lateur
• Re: End-of-scope actions: do/eval duality. by abigail
• Re: End-of-scope actions: do/eval duality. by Branden
• Re: End-of-scope actions: do/eval duality. by Simon Cozens
• Re: End-of-scope actions: do/eval duality. by abigail
• Re: End-of-scope actions: do/eval duality. by Tony Olekshy
• End-of-scope actions: Error messages. by Tony Olekshy
• End-of-scope actions: Reference model 2.0.2.1. by Tony Olekshy
• End-of-scope actions: POST blocks. by Tony Olekshy
• Re: End-of-scope actions: POST blocks. by Tony Olekshy
• Re: End-of-scope actions: POST blocks. by James Mastros
• Re: End-of-scope actions: POST blocks. by Tony Olekshy
• End-of-scope actions: Visibility. by Tony Olekshy
• End-of-scope actions: Background. by Tony Olekshy
• Re: End-of-scope actions: Background. by Simon Cozens
• Re: End-of-scope actions: Background. by Graham Barr
• Re: End-of-scope actions: Background. by Nicholas Clark
• Re: End-of-scope actions: Background. by Peter Scott
• Re: End-of-scope actions: Background. by Peter Scott
• Re: End-of-scope actions: Background. by Jarkko Hietaniemi
• Re: End-of-scope actions: Background. by Branden
• Re: End-of-scope actions: Background. by Tony Olekshy
• Re: End-of-scope actions: Background. by Tony Olekshy