Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return"

On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 05:01:03AM +1100, Damian Conway wrote:
>    > Really?  Are lexicals in the sub visible in the post handler?
> 
> No. Only the original arguments and the return value.
>    
>    > (Of course I realize *F does not illustrate this...)
> 
> Exactly. ;-)
> 
> Actually, I do agree that Perl 6 ought to provide a universal "destructor"
> mechanism on *any* block. For historical reasons, I suppose it should be
> C<continue>, though I would much prefer a more generic name, such as
> C<cleanup>.

C<mop> ? :-)

-- 
$jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/
        # There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'.
        # It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen

• assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by David L. Nicol
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Branden
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by James Mastros
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by John Porter
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by abigail
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by John Porter
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Damian Conway
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by John Porter
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Bart Lateur
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Johan Vromans
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by John Porter
• more POST recitation by David L. Nicol
• Re: more POST recitation by Ken Fox
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Ariel Scolnicov
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Damian Conway
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Jarkko Hietaniemi
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by John Porter
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by David L. Nicol
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Damian Conway
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Edward Peschko
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Johan Vromans
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by abigail
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by John Porter
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Tony Olekshy
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by John Porter
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of"return" by Peter Scott
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by John Porter
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of"return" by Peter Scott
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of"return" by David L. Nicol
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of"return" by Peter Scott
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by John Porter
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by David L. Nicol
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Nicholas Clark
• POST blocks (like END, but in a sub or sub-like scope) by David L. Nicol
• Re: POST blocks (like END, but in a sub or sub-like scope) by John Porter
• Re: POST blocks (like END, but in a sub or sub-like scope) by Nicholas Clark
• Re: POST blocks (like END, but in a sub or sub-like scope) by Bart Lateur
• Re: POST blocks (like END, but in a sub or sub-like scope) by John Porter
• Re: POST blocks (like END, but in a sub or sub-like scope) by David L. Nicol
• Re: POST blocks (like END, but in a sub or sub-like scope) by Nicholas Clark
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Glenn Linderman
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Glenn Linderman
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Glenn Linderman
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by John Porter
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Branden
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Simon Cozens
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by John Porter
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Simon Cozens
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Branden
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Branden
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Branden
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by abigail
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by David L. Nicol
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Branden
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by John Porter
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of"return" by Peter Scott
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by David L. Nicol
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by James Mastros
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Johan Vromans
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by James Mastros
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by John Porter
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Bart Lateur
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by James Mastros
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by James Mastros
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by abigail
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by James Mastros
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Branden
• Re: a name for the currently executing sub by Dan Sugalski
• Re: a name for the currently executing sub by David L. Nicol
• Re: a name for the currently executing sub by Dan Sugalski
• Re: a name for the currently executing sub by Nicholas Clark
• Re: a name for the currently executing sub by Peter Scott
• a name for the currently executing sub by David L. Nicol
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by John Porter
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by David L. Nicol
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by James Mastros
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by David L. Nicol