Re: POST blocks (like END, but in a sub or sub-like scope)

David L. Nicol wrote:
> 
> Do you agree that they shouldn't get tacked on until execution passes their
> definition, unlike END blocks which get appended when they are parsed?

Yes, absolutely; that is an important point.

END blocks are different because there is only ever one activation record
for the file (ignoring threads); lexicals in the file are known at
compile time, and so are visible to the END block.
Lambdas deserve post blocks too. :-)

-- 
John Porter

You can't keep Perl6 Perl5.

• assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by David L. Nicol
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Branden
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by James Mastros
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by John Porter
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by abigail
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by John Porter
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Damian Conway
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by John Porter
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Bart Lateur
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Johan Vromans
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by John Porter
• more POST recitation by David L. Nicol
• Re: more POST recitation by Ken Fox
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Ariel Scolnicov
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Damian Conway
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Jarkko Hietaniemi
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by John Porter
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by David L. Nicol
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Damian Conway
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Edward Peschko
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Johan Vromans
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by abigail
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by John Porter
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Tony Olekshy
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by John Porter
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of"return" by Peter Scott
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by John Porter
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of"return" by Peter Scott
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of"return" by David L. Nicol
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of"return" by Peter Scott
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by John Porter
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by David L. Nicol
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Nicholas Clark
• POST blocks (like END, but in a sub or sub-like scope) by David L. Nicol
• Re: POST blocks (like END, but in a sub or sub-like scope) by John Porter
• Re: POST blocks (like END, but in a sub or sub-like scope) by Nicholas Clark
• Re: POST blocks (like END, but in a sub or sub-like scope) by Bart Lateur
• Re: POST blocks (like END, but in a sub or sub-like scope) by John Porter
• Re: POST blocks (like END, but in a sub or sub-like scope) by David L. Nicol
• Re: POST blocks (like END, but in a sub or sub-like scope) by Nicholas Clark
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Glenn Linderman
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Glenn Linderman
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Glenn Linderman
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by John Porter
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Branden
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Simon Cozens
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by John Porter
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Simon Cozens
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Branden
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Branden
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Branden
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by abigail
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by David L. Nicol
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Branden
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by John Porter
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of"return" by Peter Scott
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by David L. Nicol
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by James Mastros
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Johan Vromans
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by James Mastros
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by John Porter
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Bart Lateur
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by James Mastros
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by James Mastros
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by abigail
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by James Mastros
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Branden
• Re: a name for the currently executing sub by Dan Sugalski
• Re: a name for the currently executing sub by David L. Nicol
• Re: a name for the currently executing sub by Dan Sugalski
• Re: a name for the currently executing sub by Nicholas Clark
• Re: a name for the currently executing sub by Peter Scott
• a name for the currently executing sub by David L. Nicol
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by John Porter
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by David L. Nicol
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by James Mastros
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by David L. Nicol