Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return"

Damian Conway wrote:
> 
> Actually, I do agree that Perl 6 ought to provide a universal "destructor"
> mechanism on *any* block. For historical reasons, I suppose it should be
> C<continue>, though I would much prefer a more generic name, such as
> C<cleanup>.

But in some sense it's much more like the file-level END block.
It should have visibility to the lexicals in the block to which
it applies.  That's why, as I advocated wrt catch blocks in,
for example,
  http://archive.develooper.com/perl6-language@perl.org/msg02294.html
that the "handler" block should be nested within the block to
which it pertains, in much the same way that BEGIN and END blocks
reside inside the file to which they pertain.

So:

	sub readit {
		open F, "< $f" or die "$f: $!";
		<F>;

		catch { ... }
		end { close F }
	}

-- 
John Porter

You can't keep Perl6 Perl5.

• assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by David L. Nicol
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Branden
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by James Mastros
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by John Porter
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by abigail
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by John Porter
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Damian Conway
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by John Porter
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Bart Lateur
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Johan Vromans
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by John Porter
• more POST recitation by David L. Nicol
• Re: more POST recitation by Ken Fox
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Ariel Scolnicov
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Damian Conway
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Jarkko Hietaniemi
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by John Porter
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by David L. Nicol
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Damian Conway
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Edward Peschko
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Johan Vromans
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by abigail
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by John Porter
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Tony Olekshy
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by John Porter
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of"return" by Peter Scott
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by John Porter
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of"return" by Peter Scott
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of"return" by David L. Nicol
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of"return" by Peter Scott
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by John Porter
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by David L. Nicol
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Nicholas Clark
• POST blocks (like END, but in a sub or sub-like scope) by David L. Nicol
• Re: POST blocks (like END, but in a sub or sub-like scope) by John Porter
• Re: POST blocks (like END, but in a sub or sub-like scope) by Nicholas Clark
• Re: POST blocks (like END, but in a sub or sub-like scope) by Bart Lateur
• Re: POST blocks (like END, but in a sub or sub-like scope) by John Porter
• Re: POST blocks (like END, but in a sub or sub-like scope) by David L. Nicol
• Re: POST blocks (like END, but in a sub or sub-like scope) by Nicholas Clark
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Glenn Linderman
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Glenn Linderman
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Glenn Linderman
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by John Porter
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Branden
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Simon Cozens
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by John Porter
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Simon Cozens
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Branden
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Branden
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Branden
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by abigail
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by David L. Nicol
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Branden
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by John Porter
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of"return" by Peter Scott
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by David L. Nicol
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by James Mastros
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Johan Vromans
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by James Mastros
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by John Porter
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Bart Lateur
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by James Mastros
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by James Mastros
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by abigail
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by James Mastros
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by Branden
• Re: a name for the currently executing sub by Dan Sugalski
• Re: a name for the currently executing sub by David L. Nicol
• Re: a name for the currently executing sub by Dan Sugalski
• Re: a name for the currently executing sub by Nicholas Clark
• Re: a name for the currently executing sub by Peter Scott
• a name for the currently executing sub by David L. Nicol
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by John Porter
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by David L. Nicol
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by James Mastros
• Re: assign to magic name-of-function variable instead of "return" by David L. Nicol