Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: > > I rather like the idea that contract names are themselves namespace > > I rather dislike it: I think we are trying to stuff to much information > on the package namespaces. Well, I didn't say *package* namespace; I'm just pointing out that contract names can probably use the same kind of hierarchical categorization that other names do. > And for the the next J. D. P. person that comes along we say "tough > luck"? No thanks, that's exactly the same mess we are now with the > package names. When you come up with a solution to this problem, please send an email to ICANN. -- John Porter You can't keep Perl6 Perl5.Thread Previous | Thread Next