Front page | perl.perl6.language |
Postings from January 2001
At 10:37 PM 1/31/2001 +0100, abigail@foad.org wrote:
>On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 10:18:19AM -0500, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> > On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Casey R. Tweten wrote:
> >
> > > <opinion>
> > > Not that there needs to be any discussion on this but IMHO things that
> > > can reasonably live outside the core should. I heard somewhere that
> > > most people think this way too.
> >
> > This is why there hasn't been much discussion on it -- there's not really
> > much to discuss.
>
>
>Odd. I'd expect a lot of (pointless) discussion about it.
>
> "It's reasonable for `foo' to live outside of the core!"
> "No, it isn't!"
> "Yes, it is; I never use it!"
> "It should be in the core, I often use it!"
We've already done that one... :)
The core's going to look big, but be small, and I think if you want you can
find a lot of the pointless discussion on the internals list archive somewhere.
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
dan@sidhe.org have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next