Re: RFC 126 (v1) Ensuring Perl's object-oriented future

At 05:12 AM 8/19/00 +1000, Damian Conway wrote:
>    > The main downside of accessors is that you can't (currently) say
>    >
>    >     local $obj->attribute = 2;
>
>Even if C<attribute> returns an lvalue???

If it does, how do you localize it?  What would that mean?

--
Peter Scott
Pacific Systems Design Technologies

• RFC 126 (v1) Ensuring Perl's object-oriented future by Perl6 RFC Librarian
• Re: RFC 126 (v1) Ensuring Perl's object-oriented future by J. David Blackstone
• Re: RFC 126 (v1) Ensuring Perl's object-oriented future by Damian Conway
• Re: RFC 126 (v1) Ensuring Perl's object-oriented future by Peter Scott
• Re: RFC 126 (v1) Ensuring Perl's object-oriented future by David L. Nicol
• Re: RFC 126 (v1) Ensuring Perl's object-oriented future by Larry Wall
• Re: RFC 126 (v1) Ensuring Perl's object-oriented future by John Siracusa
• READ THIS: Take it to -objects! (was Re: RFC 126 (v1) Ensuring Perl's object-oriented future) by Nathan Wiger