Front page | perl.perl6.language.objects |
Postings from August 2000
Markus Peter <warp@spin.de> writes: > --On 22.08.2000 18:24 Uhr +0000 David L. Nicol wrote: > > > > > Regardless of what its called, in a method called as a subroutine, > > the variable could refer to the last instance of this kind of object > > used by this thread. > > Hmm.... Does that mean if I once all $obj->method() and then afterwards > somewhere else obj::method() then $ME or whatever it is called still holds > $obj ? If yes, why? I can imagine _some_ cases where that's useful, > especially if someone is sloppily mixing procedural and object oriented > programming, but I can also imagine many more cases where it adds > confusion. > > In my opinion the contents of $ME should allow to determine wether it was > called as a procedure or as a method, the easiest way to do that is undef > for procedure, object for method and classname for class methods. Procedure reference for a procedure call please. It makes for some nice wins with anonymous subroutines... -- PiersThread Previous | Thread Next