Front page | perl.perl6.language.objects |
Postings from August 2000
> What I meant to say was more along the lines of "if this could be done as a > macro, does it need to be a pragma, or could it be part of a standard macro > package?" > > And, secondly, "if this *is* part of a standard macro package, wouldn't it > be cool to let it shove arbitrary code around rather than just doing > invocant access syntax?" Sure. *If* the hypothetical macro package comes to be, this and many other proposals could be subsumed by it. But that's a mighty big "if" :-) DamianThread Previous | Thread Next