Front page | perl.perl6.internals |
Postings from April 2008
From: "James Keenan via RT" <parrotbug-followup@parrotcode.org> Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 10:46:15 -0700 On Sun Mar 16 10:02:32 2008, rgrjr wrote: > I think it ought to happen, though I think Allison just wanted a ticket > for updating existing PDDs, and not for a whole new PDD. I asked > Allison for a clarification on 11-Mar in Will's "[oops; continuation > 0xb6926320 of type 22 is trying to jump from runloop 15008 to runloop > 1]" thread, and had been waiting for that. > > But I do agree that it ought to be a separate ticket. The underlying > issue is still with us, but has outgrown the original ticket. > Okay. I will now close this ticket. For more granular tracking, I recommend that a separate RT be opened for each existing PDD which needs updating. Thank you very much. kid51 OK, I've finished the writeup for one or more new tickets; please advise on whether this is on target, and how to file it. My personal recommendation is for a single design/documentation ticket, the satisfaction of which will generate a number of implementation tickets. FWIW, the issue seems much less scary for having written it up. It probably also helps that I've let go of the notion that we can ever remove all continuation barriers; it's a big job, and I still can't think of a compelling use case for needing to do so. -- BobThread Previous | Thread Next