develooper Front page | perl.perl6.internals | Postings from February 2006

Re: OS.pmc patch to add 'ls'

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Joshua Isom
Date:
February 13, 2006 17:52
Subject:
Re: OS.pmc patch to add 'ls'
Message ID:
6999dc0e222160d27d329877b511cad0@ritalin.shout.net
On Feb 13, 2006, at 6:28 PM, Joshua Hoblitt wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 08:09:45PM -0000, Jonathan Worthington wrote:
>> I agree with Chris on minimising the amount of places we do security 
>> stuff
>> as far as is sensible.  However, I would think that the interface for 
>> doing
>> sandboxing style stuff would allow restriction of certain types of
>> operation (e.g. filesystem access) rather than individual operations
>> though, so as to help eliminate the moving target issue.
>
> It's pretty clear from this thread that we are underspeced on both the
> I/O and security subsystems.  Hopefully Chip can chime in on this...
>
> -J

IO's underspeced, docs/ROADMAP.pod lists many TODO's regarding the IO 
subsystem(and is outdated).  Socket support isn't speced, and directory 
handling isn't speced at all.  The security pdd is outdated and seems 
more concept and imagining possibilities than saying how it should be 
implemented.  In essence, from what I can tell, if it's not implemented 
yet, it seems as though it's underspeced for how it should be.


Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About