Front page | perl.perl6.internals |
Postings from March 2002
Re: typedefs
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next
From:
Dan Sugalski
Date:
March 22, 2002 08:36
Subject:
Re: typedefs
Message ID:
a05101503b8c10d5aef84@[63.120.19.221]
At 10:02 AM -0500 3/22/02, Bryan C. Warnock wrote:
>We're still all over the place with typedef name formats. We've FOO, Foo,
>and foo_t. We tried to hash this out before, but we didn't come to a clear
>consensus. (We got sidetracked by typedeffing pointers to typedefs.)
All Parrot typedef'd things will be in lower case with a leading cap.
No data has a Parrot_ prefix--that's saved for the embedding and
extending headers. The sole exception is the PMC, and only because
that's an abbreviation so it's appropriate. That means Intval,
String, Encoding, and whatnot.
I'm up in the air as to whether any of the core routines should have
a Parrot prefix--I'm thinking not, as I don't think any of them
should be exposed.
--
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
dan@sidhe.org have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next