Re: [PATCH] Nearly the last of the warnings.

On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Melvin Smith wrote:
>(I Wrote):
> >diff -u -r1.12 jit.c
> >--- jit.c         29 Jan 2002 14:05:31 -0000          1.12
> >+++ jit.c         5 Feb 2002 20:46:43 -0000
> >@@ -214,7 +214,7 @@
> >                         address = (INTVAL *)&s->strlen;
> >                         break;
> >                 case 6:
> >-                        address = (INTVAL *)s->encoding;
> >+                        address = (INTVAL *)&s->encoding;
>
> Gasp --  an example of a warning actually identifiying a bug!?

Surprised me - it got away in the storm of warnings no doubt ;-}

/J\
-- 
Jonathan Stowe                      |
<http://www.gellyfish.com>          |      This space for rent
                                    |

• [PATCH] Nearly the last of the warnings. by Jonathan Stowe
• Re: [PATCH] Nearly the last of the warnings. by Melvin Smith
• Re: [PATCH] Nearly the last of the warnings. by Jonathan Stowe
• [REPATCH]Re: [PATCH] Nearly the last of the warnings. by Jonathan Stowe
• RE: [REPATCH]Re: [PATCH] Nearly the last of the warnings. by Brent Dax
• RE: [REPATCH]Re: [PATCH] Nearly the last of the warnings. by Jonathan Stowe
• Re: [PATCH] Nearly the last of the warnings. by Andy Dougherty
• Re: [PATCH] Nearly the last of the warnings. by Nicholas Clark
• Re: [PATCH] Nearly the last of the warnings. by Andy Dougherty
• Re: [PATCH] Nearly the last of the warnings. by Simon Cozens
• Re: [PATCH] Nearly the last of the warnings. by Andy Dougherty
• Re: [PATCH] Nearly the last of the warnings. by Simon Cozens
• Re: [PATCH] Nearly the last of the warnings. by Jonathan Stowe