Re: [PATCH] Constant Access Macros

On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 10:22:35AM +0100, Simon Cozens wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 11:37:37PM -0400, Jason Gloudon wrote:
> > Here is a patch for macros for accessing constants from ops.  This uses
> > (INT|STR|NUM)_PCONST(i) for the relevant types. Best to avoid filling opcode
> > definitions with manual structure dereferences.
> 
> Nice idea, but I'd *much* rather it were done in process_opfunc.pl. Best to
> avoid filling the source with macros - we've been down that path before. :)

What about the current macros for NUM_REG etc ?

-- 
Jason

• [PATCH] (Third try) by Gregor N. Purdy
• Re: [PATCH] (Third try) by Simon Cozens
• Re: [PATCH] (Third try) by Gregor N. Purdy
• [PATCH] Constant Access Macros by Jason Gloudon
• Re: [PATCH] Constant Access Macros by Simon Cozens
• Re: [PATCH] Constant Access Macros by Jason Gloudon
• Re: [PATCH] Constant Access Macros by Simon Cozens
• [PATCH] Constant Access Macros (version 2) by Jason Gloudon
• Re: [PATCH] Constant Access Macros (version 2) by Gregor N. Purdy
• Re: [PATCH] Constant Access Macros (version 2) by Jason Gloudon
• Re: [PATCH] Constant Access Macros (version 2) by Simon Cozens
• Re: [PATCH] Constant Access Macros by Dan Sugalski
• Re: [PATCH] (Third try) by Simon Cozens