Front page | perl.perl6.internals |
Postings from September 2001
From: Bryan C . Warnock
September 30, 2001 07:34
Message ID: email@example.com
I've been testing situations where sizeof(opcode_t) != sizeof(IV) !=
I got most of the casting and arithmetic problems patched , but am running
into alignment problems with the bytecode because it currently expects
sizeof(opcode_t) == sizeof(IV). (Or something, I can't tell quite yet
whether the problems in the assembler or the _unpack function.) In either
case, I know that we'll still have alignment problems once we hit runops
What are we going to do about this?
 Why won't gcc allow bit-operands on pointers? Is that illegal?
Bryan C. Warnock
by Bryan C . Warnock