Re: Should the op dispatch loop decode?

Benjamin Stuhl <tiriath@yahoo.com> writes:
>I don't see where shadow functions are really necessary -
>after all, no one has ever complained that you can't do 
>
>pp_chomp(sv); /* or pp_add(sv1, sv2), for that matter */
>
>in Perl 5. 

Yes we did. And note the doop.c file which is part answer
to the shadows.

Given the inner functions we could presumable generate the decode
functions (c.f. xsubpp)

-- 
Nick Ing-Simmons

• Should the op dispatch loop decode? by Dan Sugalski
• Re: Should the op dispatch loop decode? by Bart Lateur
• Re: Should the op dispatch loop decode? by Dan Sugalski
• Re: Should the op dispatch loop decode? by Uri Guttman
• Re: Should the op dispatch loop decode? by Damien Neil
• Re: Should the op dispatch loop decode? by Dan Sugalski
• Re: Should the op dispatch loop decode? by Benjamin Stuhl
• Re: Should the op dispatch loop decode? by Nick Ing-Simmons
• Re: Should the op dispatch loop decode? by Dan Sugalski
• Re: Should the op dispatch loop decode? by Benjamin Stuhl
• Re: Should the op dispatch loop decode? by Dan Sugalski
• Re: Should the op dispatch loop decode? by Simon Cozens
• Re: Should the op dispatch loop decode? by Simon Cozens