On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 02:15:16AM +0100, Simon Cozens wrote:
> Or we could keep it out of core. It's up to you, really.
No, it isn't. It's up to Larry, or to whoever gets the regex
pumpkin.
I'm withdrawing from this discussion: My intent was to clarify
exactly why someone might want to treat Katakana and Hiragana as
equivalent for matching purposes, not to take a stand on what
features Perl should include or how these should be implemented.
> > to write the on-youmi of a Kanji,
>
> Hrm, no, not usually; furigana are almost always hiragana, and
> learner's textbooks - bah, they're not real Japanese. :)
I believe you are confused; kun-youmi and on-youmi have nothing
to do with furigana.
- Damien
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next