develooper Front page | perl.perl6.internals | Postings from April 2001

Re: Perl_foo() vs foo() etc

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Dan Sugalski
Date:
April 11, 2001 09:22
Subject:
Re: Perl_foo() vs foo() etc
Message ID:
5.0.2.1.0.20010411122056.019a0ba0@24.8.96.48
At 12:05 PM 4/11/2001 -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote:
>On Wed, 11 Apr 2001, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>
> > No. That's because you won't include perl.h when you embed perl in your
> > app--you'll include something like per/embed.h or perlembed.h that has 
> just
> > the definitions for the bits perl exports for embedding.
>
>Ah, ok.  That's a change from perl5 practice, but probably a good
>one.  It's worth noting explicitly in the appropriate PDD.

Good point. Folks are going to assume we're doing things the perl 5 way 
unless we specify otherwise.

					Dan

--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski                          even samurai
dan@sidhe.org                         have teddy bears and even
                                      teddy bears get drunk


Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About