develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from July 2013

Re: perlopentut branch for review

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Alexander Hartmaier
Date:
July 10, 2013 19:23
Subject:
Re: perlopentut branch for review
Message ID:
CAB49QrYXrjU4Qbjg9BV7yd=_51mZEU=LAv7k=CQCbB-K+8+c9w@mail.gmail.com
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Dave Rolsky <autarch@urth.org> wrote:

> On Sat, 9 Feb 2013, Alexander Hartmaier wrote:
>
>  mst suggested to keep the paragraph about the shell for sysadmins that are
>> used to the shell, otherwise I would have removed it too.
>>
>
> I don't mind putting it back, but I don't think it belongs at the top of
> the document.
>
>
>  The 'or die' was put intentionally on a separate line by me so that all
>> examples follow the same coding style but later changed back in the first
>> example that the different mode characters can be recognized easier.
>>
>
> I changed this because the porting/podcheck test was complaining about it.
>
>
> Hello porters,
after some month of silence I'd like to know if you think that it makes
sense merging my changes to the current perlopentut until a new, completely
rewritten is completed?

-Alex


>
> -dave
>
> /*============================**==============================**==
> http://VegGuide.org               http://blog.urth.org
> Your guide to all that's veg      House Absolute(ly Pointless)
> ==============================**==============================***/
>


Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About