On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 10:54:16AM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote: > On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 04:24:31PM -0700, Jesse Luehrs via RT wrote: > > I think unlinking the dependents and closing it is fine. > > But are all the dependents actually resolved? > > (In that, if we thought that something was worth fixing for 5.10.1, but > ultimately didn't, don't we still think that it's worth fixing?) Well, yeah, that's why they are still open. If we still think we want them to be fixed specifically by 5.18, we can add them to the 5.18 meta ticket. -doyThread Previous | Thread Next