Re: [perl #82954] Can't do {n,m} with n > m in regex - make warning?

* Karl Williamson via RT <perlbug-followup@perl.org> [2012-02-12T12:03:32]
> The patch to change this into a warning is trivial; I've done it except
> for the tests.  I'm inclined to think we should do it.  And I more
> strongly than ever think we should pre-deprecate an unescaped '{', and
> will start working on that.

We should do this.

-- 
rjbs

• [perl #82954] Can't do {n,m} with n > m in regex - make warning? by Ed Avis via RT
• [perl #82954] Can't do {n,m} with n > m in regex - make warning? by Karl Williamson via RT
• [perl #82954] Can't do {n,m} with n > m in regex - make warning? by Ed Avis via RT
• Re: [perl #82954] Can't do {n,m} with n > m in regex - make warning? by demerphq
• [perl #82954] Can't do {n,m} with n > m in regex - make warning? by Karl Williamson via RT
• Re: [perl #82954] Can't do {n,m} with n > m in regex - make warning? by Ricardo Signes
• Re: [perl #82954] Can't do {n,m} with n > m in regex - make warning? by Karl Williamson
• Re: [perl #82954] Can't do {n,m} with n > m in regex - make warning? by demerphq