> There have been multiple proposals involving changes to make syntax more > compliant (read: up-to-date) with Unicode recommendations. If we follow > this route for all of them, we end up with a large number of > backward-incompatible changes. Hence I would prefer for this to be > enabled under ‘use feature’. To avoid an explosion (ahem, look what we > already have!) of too many individual features, let’s make all the > Unicode changes at once and put them under the ‘unicode_syntax’ feature. Karl, what did you think about this suggestion? It seems plausible, although we'd probably want to keep it an experimental feature until it was pretty much done. :) -- rjbsThread Previous | Thread Next