On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Jesse Luehrs <doy@tozt.net> wrote: > On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 03:03:01PM -0400, Eric Brine wrote: > > On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Jesse Luehrs <doy@tozt.net> wrote: > > > > > I don't think else should be overridable. > > > > > > Everything you say about "if-else" also applies to "try-catch". Should it > > be impossible to override "catch"? > > Nothing about this is making it impossible to override anything. You > just do so by overriding 'if' instead of 'else' (or 'try' instead of > 'catch', in this case). > I know. And my question remains unanswered. You said it should be impossible to override "else". Do you also believe it should be impossible to override "catch"? If not, then why not? All the reasons you gave to justify making it impossible to override "else" also apply to "catch". - EricThread Previous | Thread Next