Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from March 2012
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 06:26:26PM -0700, James E Keenan via RT wrote: > On Wed Jan 18 08:59:07 2012, nicholas wrote: > > > > then I think that the original report fails to mention that there is a > > server running on port 2004 on localhost accepting connections. > > > > Hence I don't think that this is correct: > > > > > The implication these failures is that neither the targeting of uClibc > > > libraries nor the cross-compiling is germane to the failure. > > > > A stack backtrace, possibly from a core dump, would be helpful. > > > > Nicholas Clark > > > > Since we haven't heard from the OP in nearly 6 years, should we reject > the ticket? Stall it? Not sure if 6 years is fair, as no-one replied in that time. However, the OP hasn't replied in the two months since you wrote the first reply, which is a while. It trouble me that we're sort of making policy up as we go along, but not recording it anywhere. I feels more to me that this is "stalled", as it looks like a valid bug that may still be a bug, but we're not able to make progress on it. Nicholas ClarkThread Previous | Thread Next