develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from March 2012

Re: clearer smoke signals (was Re: [perl #106538] Carp is missing adot)

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Nicholas Clark
Date:
March 26, 2012 10:36
Subject:
Re: clearer smoke signals (was Re: [perl #106538] Carp is missing adot)
Message ID:
20120326173633.GN9069@plum.flirble.org
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 11:39:52AM -0500, Jesse Luehrs wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 05:12:55PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> >   Also those 1 or 2 characters can make a difference when the most important
> >   bit is actually the detail of PASS(...) or FAIL(...), which can fall off the
> >   right
> 
> Then wouldn't it be even more useful to have the PASS(...)/FAIL(...) bit
> first?

I thought about that, but forgot to say that that makes it hard to sort by
subject in a mail client to get all results for the same platform together.
Right now, sorting by subject is a fast way to determine when a platform
started to fail (or pass)

Nicholas Clark
Thread Previous | Thread Next

nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About