Am 19.02.2012 07:47, schrieb Father Chrysostomos via RT: > On Sat Feb 18 21:33:01 2012, rcaputo wrote: >> On Mon Feb 06 05:15:27 2012, nicholas wrote: >>> On Wed Feb 01 10:58:27 2012, mst@shadowcat.co.uk wrote: >>>> On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 09:33:02AM +0000, Paul LeoNerd Evans wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 09:34:00AM -0800, Father Chrysostomos via RT >>>> wrote: >>>>>> OK, then let me repeat my two questions: Does anyone want to >>>> write a >>>>>> patch for that? Should I revert Darin McBride’s patch >>>> (b60dd40238)? >>> >>>> Unless there's any reason to do it a different way, I'd vote for: >>>> >>>> "Tell us where to look to get a pre-dmcbride-patch version, let >>>> somebody >>>> provide a new patch against that, and once that's considered good >>>> revert >>>> his patch and introduce the new one." >>> >>> Agree, because what we have now is tested, and better than what we had >>> before. >> >> Challenge accepted. See attachment. Patched directly against blead. > > I would very much like to see this in 5.15.8, but unfortunately I am > extremely busy and doubt I will have the time. Would any other > committer be able to take care of this? > Thanks, applied (with small whitespace editing) as fc013e910ecb5926cbd4a39a00ef6428372a82a1 Unfortunately, I didn't apply the patch through `git am` but through `git apply`, so the original attribution to Rocco got lost. -maxThread Previous