Nicholas Clark wrote: >I'm still not sure what 'EXPR' should be replaced with, in the documentation. That part of the documentation doesn't distinguish between parenthesised and unparenthesised argument lists, which it would have to to correctly describe the parsing there. I think it shouldn't be replaced at all: it's (mostly) documenting semantics rather than syntax, and the =item line is a stylised representation of the parameter list rather than a real exposition of the grammar. perlop accurately indicates how unary functions are parsed. -zeframThread Previous | Thread Next