develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from August 2011

Re: RFC: What mention of user-defined casing should b e left in thedocs?

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Karl Williamson
Date:
August 19, 2011 13:01
Subject:
Re: RFC: What mention of user-defined casing should b e left in thedocs?
Message ID:
4E4EC0E5.60106@khwilliamson.com
On 07/28/2011 09:38 PM, Karl Williamson wrote:
> No one has objected to my proposal to go ahead and remove this
> problematic feature in 5.16, as planned and documented in 5.14.
>
> The question is what documentation about it to retain? The 5.14 docs
> added significant detail on the problems and issues with this feature.
>
> http://bit.ly/pwkTR7
>
> There was a discussion in p5p on what to do about documenting removed
> features, but I can't seem to find it. I do remember that there were
> some people who thought that the documentation should be retained. But I
> wonder what to do in this case where the feature is being removed
> because of significant inadequacies in it, such as not following scoping
> rules, etc.
>

I haven't seen any response to this.  Are there any objections to 
replacing the entire lengthy section in perlunicode.pod with:

=head2 User-Defined Case Mappings (for serious hackers only)

B<This feature has been removed as of Perl 5.16.>
The CPAN module L<Unicode::Casing> provides better functionality without
the drawbacks that this feature had.  If you are using a Perl earlier
than 5.16, this feature was most fully documented in the 5.14 version of
this pod:
L<https://github.com/mirrors/perl/blob/v5.14.0/pod/perlunicode.pod#User-Defined_Case_Mappings_(for_serious_hackers_only)>


Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About