Abigail wrote: > In File::Copy 2.15 and later, there's a slight difference between 'copy', > and 'cp'. The latter will preserve the permission bits, as the system 'cp' > doest. It doesn't preserve timestamps (since a plain 'cp' doesn't do so > either). --- But Why should unix get the worst support when Syscopy on VMS, OS/2, Mac and Win32, all use routines that preserve all the file attributes. Why would one choose to do less on unix when the system 'cp' command has the ability to copy everything. Not copying metadata isn't copying the file file. Now if the routine was named File::CopyData, it might be different, but now days, I'd expect a digital copy to be 'precise' and complete. Is there some reason why this shouldn't be the default?Thread Previous