develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from April 2011

Re: PATCH WANTED Re: Is perldelta missing an incompatibility entryfor \cX?

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Karl Williamson
Date:
April 28, 2011 08:49
Subject:
Re: PATCH WANTED Re: Is perldelta missing an incompatibility entryfor \cX?
Message ID:
4DB98C22.4060800@khwilliamson.com
On 04/28/2011 09:34 AM, Tom Christiansen wrote:
> Karl Williamson<public@khwilliamson.com>  wrote
>     on Thu, 28 Apr 2011 09:24:55 MDT:
>
>> I will take those lines and create a patch forthwith and post it here.
>
> Ok good: Karl, I'll leave it you.
>
> Still can't believe that Java regexps just ^64 with whatever
> the code point is on \cX.  But I guess that's mostly what we
> used to do too, right -- I mean, before 5.14?
>
> --tom
>

But those lines are in perlop, not perlrun.  And I don't understand how 
this is is about an incompatibility; rather it is a restatement of a 
table in algorithmic form for the convenience of the reader

Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About