Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from April 2011
On 04/21/2011 08:22 AM, Zefram wrote: > Karl Williamson wrote: >> I changed all occurrences I could think of in the text to make /aa not >> distinct. What have I missed. > > * the section heading lists it as a fifth modifier > > * the second sentence, speaking about mutual exclusion, treats the > modifiers as having purely on/off states, and so is at least misleading > if one of the modifiers can be doubly on > > * the fourth list item, describing the /a modifier, doesn't describe > the /aa behaviour > > * the opening phrase of the fifth list item, "The /aa modifier", treats > /aa as a modifier in its own right > > * comparing the fourth and fifth list items contrasts "the /a modifier" > with "the /aa modifier", treating them as distinct both in the text > and in the list structure > > I don't see any part of that section treating /aa as a special form of /a > other than that mention of "four new ... modifiers". What have I missed? > > -zefram > I failed to look at perldelta. I can submit a patch, if desired.Thread Previous | Thread Next