On Wed 6.Apr'11 at 13:05:10 +0200, Reini Urban wrote: > The necessary fixes are still in my cygwin branch on github.com, and will > be the base for the upcoming cygwin package, which is in testing right now. > It's not so bad, less errors and less patches needed since 5.10. I'm glad it's "better" and sorry it's not yet "good" -- After 5.14, what are the chances of you (or someone else) setting up a full-time cygwin smoker so we can watch the builds over time and catch when we introduce regressions or have outstanding fails to deal with? Since so few porters work on cygwin, we need to do _something_ to make this a bit easier. -jesseThread Previous | Thread Next