On Fri 31.Dec'10 at 0:34:21 +0100, Leon Timmermans wrote: > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 11:09 PM, Gerard Goossen <gerard@ggoossen.net> wrote: > > * Small summary: > > Before executing a subroutine/optree, there is a codegeneration step > > added where the optree is converted in an "instruction" list > > (consisting of pp_* functions with arguments). As a result the > > optree does no longer function as an execution list, i.e op_next is > > gone. > > As far as I know we entered the contentious changes freeze on the > 20th. I don't think it is realistic to think that a change of this > size will enter 5.14 at this stage. And to be honest, there seem to be > quite a compatibility issues to your patches, even if all current > tests still pass, those would need to be sorted out first anyway. Indeed. You're too late to get codegen into 5.14, though it looks like you have a bunch of test patches and other cleanups that, assuming they're reasonable and correct, could get into blead before the 5.14 freeze. -j > LeonThread Previous