Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from November 2010
Nicholas Clark <nick@ccl4.org> wrote: > It's a gut feeling, but I'd be more comfortable with it as a single long > token, rather than 2, even if that makes the patching needed larger. +1. If C< term infixop1 infixop2 term > is an expression for any pair of infix operators, we restrict our future ability to add a prefix operator that's spelled like infixop2; I think that would be a shame. -- Aaron Crane ** http://aaroncrane.co.uk/Thread Previous | Thread Next