Florian Ragwitz schrieb: > Reini Urban<rurban@x-ray.at> writes: >> It is already disabled, and most importantly not tested. I'm trying >> now to improve test coverage of the API. > > The missing tests are quite a problem really. Earlier this month I was > proposing a patch to make newPADOP private. You spoke up against it, > claiming that B::Generate actually needed it. After looking at the code, > it turns out it only needs it to reimplement newGVOP, which is really > unnecessary. > > I'd love to provide a patch removing code, and making it use newGVOP, > thereby eliminating one reason to not drop newPADOP from the public API, > but I don't have a way to make sure B::Generate is still working as > expected, given there are almost no tests :-( I don't really care for B::Generate as it is no love child of mine. I never used it. I just want to keep it alive. If you come with something better I'll use that of course. Tests: I'm writing those now. Coverage is incredibly low. -- Reini UrbanThread Previous | Thread Next