Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from July 2010
On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 16:24:48 +0200, Reini Urban <rurban@x-ray.at> wrote: > 2010/7/8 H.Merijn Brand <h.m.brand@xs4all.nl>: > > On Wed, 7 Jul 2010 16:23:45 +0200, Reini Urban <rurban@x-ray.at> wrote: > > > >> But I get a lot of benchmarks and feedback from the real-world, which I > >> try to analyse. > >> 5.6 is still the fastest by far, all non-threaded of course, then 5.8.9, > >> then 5.10, then 5.12. But some newer modules don't work with these > >> old modules anymore. > > > > Better example needed, as this seems to fall within the noise ... > > > > perl-xxx -we'$a="x" x 2000000;$_=index$a."zz".$a,"azz"' > > elapsed pass perl > > ========== ==== ================= >> [snip] > > Very very interesting. I'm pleased, but it contradicts the reports I > got elsewhere. > > Is there a mix threaded/non-threaded somewhere? It is planned, but that might take some time, as I am not motivated to add a threaded branch for all of this > 5.8.0 is essentially the same as 5.6.2 but much slower. > 5.8.9 slower than 5.10.1 and 5.10.0? > > A much bigger spamassasin test or Benchmark::Perl::Formance > would be really interesting. All I need is a command line that will work on all the perls I support If that line contains a script with valid perl, that would be ok -- H.Merijn Brand http://tux.nl Perl Monger http://amsterdam.pm.org/ using 5.00307 through 5.12 and porting perl5.13.x on HP-UX 10.20, 11.00, 11.11, 11.23, and 11.31, OpenSuSE 10.3, 11.0, and 11.1, AIX 5.2 and 5.3. http://mirrors.develooper.com/hpux/ http://www.test-smoke.org/ http://qa.perl.org http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/Thread Previous | Thread Next