On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 12:14 AM, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes <sthoenna@efn.org> wrote: > There are some things I want to improve about the implementation of the > yada yada (...) operator. Without reading your patch, I've been wondering how common it's now going to be for users to accidentally use flip-flop since now the difference between ... and ... is whether the syntax's context is expression or binary operator. If we ever thought that people might not be using the ... flip-flop we might consider making some kind of warning for this. Or maybe this is a policy thing and maybe we'd want to enable users to enable this or maybe just provision for plug-in-able warnings. Right now, the _ck phase of warning generation isn't pluggable, right? It plausibly could be. JoshThread Previous | Thread Next