Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from April 2010
On Apr 27, 2010, at 5:18 AM, Rafael Garcia-Suarez <rgs@consttype.org> wrote: > On 26 April 2010 22:58, David Golden <xdaveg@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 4:16 PM, <avar@cpan.org> wrote: >>> From: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avar@cpan.org> >>> >>> It's a lot easier to follow who agreed to integrating a given commit >>> to maint when it's part of the Git history. Having it in Git doesn't >>> replace the mailing list discussion, it compliments it. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avar@cpan.org> >> >> -1 on the grounds that I'd prefer less process and bureaucracy. Just >> because git *can* do something doesn't mean we have to use it. > > I would have to agree there. I'm trying to figure out a way to keep > track of who voted up a cherry-picking ; but we should keep the > process simple if we want to see maint releases in a timely and > effective fashion. For me, signed off by would be "nice" but I don't think that we are at the point where I want to require them. JThread Previous