Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from March 2010
Re: Blocker bugs left...
Thread Previous
From:
Dave Mitchell
Date:
March 8, 2010 01:01
Subject:
Re: Blocker bugs left...
Message ID:
20100308090108.GQ2839@iabyn.com
On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 05:34:42PM -0700, karl williamson wrote:
> jesse wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 05:20:03PM -0700, Curtis Jewell wrote:
>>> Two blocker bugs left, and I'm wondering if perlbug#69939 should be a
>>> third blocker or not... (I know it's a decision for Jesse, but I would
>>> not be against it)
>>
>> It's not a regression from 5.10.1, so I'm inclined not to make it
>> blocking.
>>
>>> We're getting down there, I will admit... I just feel impatient because
>>> we've been in a code freeze for 2 months and we aren't to a 5.12.0-RC1
>>> yet... and I wouldn't mind if I was able to release a Strawberry Perl
>>> 5.12.0.0 (which would require having a perl-5.12.0.tar.gz blessed first)
>>> with the April releases.
>>
>> We're all impatient. And we'd all love to see a 5.12.0 yesterday. But
>> we're not going to see an RC1 until blocking bugs are either fixed or
>> someone convinces me that a remaining blocker doesn't merit blocking
>> status.
>>
> Are people actively working on these?
As of today, I am :-)
--
The Enterprise successfully ferries an alien VIP from one place to another
without serious incident.
-- Things That Never Happen in "Star Trek" #7
Thread Previous