On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 11:02:44AM -0600, David Nicol wrote: > On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 10:12 AM, jesse <jesse@fsck.com> wrote: > > > So long as it has a shepherd > > or a well-defined "shepherd" capability that can be associated with an > authenticated identity. There are a bunch of cards ahead of this in my > deck, so nobody hold your breath. No. I really do mean a shepherd. Or a pumpkin. Or something. But I would be really unhappy to see a tool set up to enable contributions with nobody committing to make sure that contributions get quality-checked and forwarded on. A tool that's not being tended is worse than no tool and can be a horrible discouragement to new contributors. I'd love to see a tool like this, but it's important that it not be a "fire and forget" sort of thing. -Jesse --Thread Previous | Thread Next