Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from November 2009
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 5:36 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
<avarab@gmail.com>wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 00:52, Eric Brine <ikegami@adaelis.com> wrote:
> > This makes 1..5 no different than 1,2,3,4,5 in terms of functionality,
> and
> > avoids some very subtle bugs.
>
> If this doesn't get accepted for 5.12
It won't.
> it would be very good to have a
> version of your change t/op/range.t and other relevant tests that
> passes with the current behavior in blead. Whatever the semantics end
> up being they need to be tested.
>
Can do. Should it prove the bug like
is( ( join ' ', map { join '', map { ++$_ } 1..4 } 1..2 ), '2345 3456' );
or just should it simply be
is( ( join '', map { ++$_ } 1..4 ), '2345' );
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next