develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from November 2009

Re: merging in the origin/legacy-pragma git branch

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Rafael Garcia-Suarez
Date:
November 6, 2009 15:21
Subject:
Re: merging in the origin/legacy-pragma git branch
Message ID:
b77c1dce0911061521q31680a50w42bd0c91c991adde@mail.gmail.com
2009/10/30 karl williamson <public@khwilliamson.com>:
> I would like to start submitting patches to fix the "Unicode bug" wherein
> the semantics differs depending on the internal utf8-or-not representation
> of a scalar.
>
> I submitted the first steps for that quite a while back, and Rafael made a
> separate branch for that.  I'm not sure how to proceed.  I need that to go
> forward.  Do I do something, or what?  It is a tiny patch.
>
> At the time Rafael expressed some concern that I was using up a bit from
> PL_hints, and suggested using the newer hash instead.  I would prefer to
> keep using PL_hints for several reasons:
> 1) The closely related bits for locale and "use bytes" are located here, and
> it seems to make sense to keep them all in the same structure.  And there
> are several bits available even after this one is used up.
> 2) It's easier for me to just copy the existing paradigm for these than to
> figure out how to do the other
> 3) I'm leery of the other scheme given all the problems there are with
> charnames in regcomp.c.  I'm pretty ignorant on this, and ignorance leads to
> paranoia, not bliss.  But I'm not sure we've gotten to the bottom of the
> cause, and I'd just as soon not get involved with depending on something
> that may be flaky.  Now perhaps this is used with  full success elsewhere,
> and my concerns are just paranoia.  But then I go back to reasons 1 and 2.

I have now merged this branch in blead. Further patches welcome :)

Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About